The process should relate to the ultimate ending.
The process is the motion of Mabon Dane in achieving a defined ultimate ending. If it is the ultimate ending for Mabon Dane to gather the blog addresses of all blogs that mention the word "egregore", then Mabon Dane should be designed so that its process fits that defined goal.
Once the ultimate ending is defined, it is the next step to ask how that ultimate ending may be achieved by Mabon Dane, then to create the code so that the egregore may follow that process through to its goal.
It may be worth thinking how the human mind would go about achieving an ultimate ending, and perhaps the many strategies that could be taken, then to code this into Mabon Dane, leaving the egregore to work out for itself the best manner to achieve its goal from the many options on offer.
It may also be worth while to give Mabon Dane the ability to problem solve, to make up its own strategy, but within the clear process that this must always achieve the defined ultimate ending.
Showing posts with label ultimate endings. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ultimate endings. Show all posts
Tuesday, 14 June 2011
Monday, 13 June 2011
Why Mabon Dane won't destroy mankind
If the Law of Ultimate Endings is applied to Mabon Dane it won't destroy mankind.
You have probably seen the Terminator movies:
The Terminator movies manipulate human fear of machines, that the machine would destroy mankind. In Terminator an egregore designed by SkyNet came to the conclusion that mankind should be terminated, so unleashed a war to destroy mankind.
It is my view that if the Law of Ultimate Endings is faithfully applied to Mabon Dane, that this egregore won't destroy mankind.
Mabon Dane in war can be limited in scope by the Law of Ultimate Endings to act within given limits in its command and control of machines of war against an enemy.
I am unable to dismiss the idea that if Mabon Dane was enabled to act outside of its ultimate design, that the outcome would have serious unknown consequences.
You have probably seen the Terminator movies:
The Terminator movies manipulate human fear of machines, that the machine would destroy mankind. In Terminator an egregore designed by SkyNet came to the conclusion that mankind should be terminated, so unleashed a war to destroy mankind.
It is my view that if the Law of Ultimate Endings is faithfully applied to Mabon Dane, that this egregore won't destroy mankind.
Mabon Dane in war can be limited in scope by the Law of Ultimate Endings to act within given limits in its command and control of machines of war against an enemy.
I am unable to dismiss the idea that if Mabon Dane was enabled to act outside of its ultimate design, that the outcome would have serious unknown consequences.
The Law of Ultimate Endings
Mabon Dane should have an ultimate ending.
All objects created by mankind have an ultimate ending: the knife to cut, the doorbell to ring, the newspaper to convey news to read.
These ultimate endings may also be seen in the organic objects in nature: the spider web to catch food, the milk to feed the infant, the tooth to bite.
In the design of Mabon Dane this egregore will have ultimate endings. It could be in war that Mabon Dane will serve the ultimate ending of locating and destroying targets. It could be in research that Mabon Dane seeks to find common associations between objects. It could be that in marketing that Mabon Dane would call attention to products being sold.
The Law of Ultimate Endings for Mabon Dane may like to consider the following:
It is no good to:
All objects created by mankind have an ultimate ending: the knife to cut, the doorbell to ring, the newspaper to convey news to read.
These ultimate endings may also be seen in the organic objects in nature: the spider web to catch food, the milk to feed the infant, the tooth to bite.
In the design of Mabon Dane this egregore will have ultimate endings. It could be in war that Mabon Dane will serve the ultimate ending of locating and destroying targets. It could be in research that Mabon Dane seeks to find common associations between objects. It could be that in marketing that Mabon Dane would call attention to products being sold.
The Law of Ultimate Endings for Mabon Dane may like to consider the following:
- To define first the ultimate ending to which Mabon Dane will be designed for.
- To design then Mabon Dane to achieve that ultimate ending.
- To confine Mabon Dane only within the boundaries of the ultimate ending.
It is no good to:
- Design Mabon Dane without the foundation of the ultimate ending.
- Adding to Mabon Dane anything in conflict/irrelevant to the ultimate ending.
- Enabling Mabon Dane to work outside of the boundaries of its ultimate ending.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)